BGS geoscientists at the Fractures Workshop February 2018
Trying to list everything we do would take me hours, so you’ll just have to trust me when I tell you that we are a very wide range of scientists, each with our own specialism and experience, all working to understand the Earth and its environmental processes.
Which is why I was so surprised to find myself at a workshop last week whose aim was to discuss something that appears to link, pretty much, all areas of BGS: fractures.
What are fractures and what’s so important about them?The full BGS definition of a fracture is (hold onto your hat):
Everyone clear? They’re basically a break in the rock. They can be a fault (a fracture where one side has moved relative to the other) or a joint (a crack).
Understanding and locating fractures is also vital when it comes to some engineering projects such as tunnels. If you get this wrong, the tunnel may collapse, and the consequences could be extremely high. Which is exactly what happened at one case study described at the workshop – this is such an interesting case that I am going to write this up as a separate blog post, so watch this space!
British Geological Survey scheme for classifying discontinuities and fillings report
Incidentally, this is a really great report with an hierarchical classification scheme and a brilliant glossary at the back so even a
So with the report and all the geological mapping we have done over the last 183 years, we must have a detailed national fractures map with every fracture and joint set located and interpreted, right…?
Fractures and fracture networks are so complex and variable that this is a really tough and massive job, particularly because fracture data haven’t been recorded systematically as part of our historic national mapping programme. To further muddy the water, the way we think about, collect and interpret fracture data is often dependent on why we're doing it and who we're doing it for.
The future challenge: how to MANUFACTURE the FRACTURE CAPTURE (ok I’ll stop it now)Fractures possess an array of attributes e.g. roughness, filling, orientation, spacing, persistence, aperture, important for different applications e.g. landslide susceptibility modelling, understanding groundwater movement…
Getting engrossed in discussions: Fracture Rapture? (couldn’t resist)
So we’re in a bit of a pickle. We need to know more about where fractures are and how they behave; we need to consider the range of scales and crustal depths at which they occur so as to satisfy the varied requirements of our work at BGS. We have a number of staff with experience in observing, simulating, analysing and modelling fractures and fracture networks on different rocks for different purposes. We have a huge resource full of core and borehole logs as well as the National Geotechnical Properties Database. Representing all this as at the national scale is not impossible, but it wouldn’t be easy and would require considerable resources. There are many questions that need to be asked and considered.
So what next? The workshop provided an opportunity for geoscientists to come together to present and discuss their latest research as well as to share some more historic experience. It was agreed that the next task is to reconvene to analyse some core and visit some field sites to continue to share and nurture the practical skills we might need in the future using the diverse resources and knowledge we have.
Another workshop is being planned too. I’ll keep you posted…